Al Mohler: prevaricating hack.
If you haven't been following the controversy, read up on it here.
The Readers Digest condensed version: Meyer publishes a review article in the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington that espouses traditional Intelligent Design argumentation: neo-Darwinism is bankrupt, mutation and selection can't generate novel body plans, 99% of biologists are wrong, real research is hard, don't read the whole article I cited, forgive me if this all sounds strangely familiar.
Scientists smell a rat, corner it, and, to Michael Behe's surprise, trap it.
Meyer's supporters start to spin, sputter, and spout BS.
Those of us on the sidelines wonder when the Discovery Institute is going to publish any original research...